Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The abortion issue: pro-choice vs. anti-abortion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (169)	3/18/2009 12:29:05 PM
From: LLCF	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 286

<Its really this simple the research doesn't get funded by the Feds without Obama's actions.> But the embyo's still die... So, it's really this simple: In a complex world it's much easier to find an evil villan to blame. That's the way some minds work. I get it. <So if there is a moral problem with the research (and I understand you think there isn't but that isn't the point we where debating)> That never came up. I think there are a LOT of "moral" (I'd use other words as well, like ethical, and common sense) problems with all sorts of research, including this!! <<Obama is morally responsible for the research that gets funded by the feds after the policy change.> Tim, I fully understand your point, dead horses (and Obama) are screaming and buring in hell... and all the others involved in the entire chain of events and issues from research to invitro clinics are exonerated. I get it. DAK