SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (464638)3/18/2009 1:20:09 PM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573682
 
So, when you dump responsibility for taking care of injured soldiers onto health insurance companies, the cost of having vets on the payroll goes up. Period. End of story.

This is exactly what will happen anyway...no vet with private insurance is likely to use the VA...i know what I am talking about.

Al



To: i-node who wrote (464638)3/18/2009 1:42:47 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573682
 
>> And I've explained it to you.

Maybe you could answer this.

Why do you think the American Legion is opposing this measure if it doesn't harm vets?



To: i-node who wrote (464638)3/18/2009 2:07:16 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573682
 
In addition, vets would have to cover copays and deductibles associated with their service related injuries wouldn't they?

So that is a tax increase on them as well as their private insurers.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News