SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (465078)3/19/2009 6:46:44 PM
From: Alighieri  Respond to of 1573924
 
And do they really think like Alghieri does, that this is just an "obsession over $165M"?

They live in the cold hard world as it...and in that world, people who chose to put themselves out there must make decisions and exercise choice...their mistake is to believe that, given the gravity of the situation, even obsessive, immature, partisan children like you would support their efforts.

Al



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (465078)3/19/2009 11:20:15 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573924
 
Jlallen, > Its going to go up to the USSC....

Fine, let the execs take it to the Supreme Court. They ought to be fired anyway. Let them retire with their $165M in bonuses, if the court rules in their favor.

It won't be taken up by the USSC but those contracts will be upheld in a court of law. The action in the House today was totally kneejerk stupid.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News