SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SilentZ who wrote (465440)3/20/2009 10:30:51 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573927
 
Z, > You may not believe in Keynesian principles, but this is all OK under them. In fact, we might need to spend more right now.

So stagflation isn't a concern?

> Red herring.

The drain on national productivity when the Baby Boomers retire is going to crush Keynesian economics.

Economics is anything but an exact science (despite Alghieri's demands for "proof"). There are no experiments you can run, except maybe in virtual environments (which itself is another subject). Economic theories work until they don't, which should warn anyone about the dangers of taking one school of thought to the extreme.

The Obama administration is taking Keynesian economic theory to a dangerous extreme, and we're all going to pay for it sooner or later. And that's a shame, because believe it or not, I really like Obama and hope he proves to be a quick study on these issues.

Tenchusatsu



To: SilentZ who wrote (465440)3/25/2009 8:48:30 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1573927
 
It's not that much worse than it was under Bush.

Not true.

And the deficit as a percentage of GDP isn't nearly as bad as it's been in the past.

Not nearly as bad as WWII, but later than that its worse than it has been in the past.