Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: randy kay who wrote (12782)	10/26/1997 2:59:00 AM
From: AlienTech	Respond to of 50167

After reading some stuff is WSJ and Barrons etc and then investigating deeper I have found that even well respected publications make errors (sure they do) and can be manipulated (especially for friends with large sums of money). I read and say hmm a million others read it and take it for granted and it affects the short term. So you follow the herd and exit before they realise just whats going on. fecklestein actually makes sence which is amazing. But had he dug deeper he would have found some real reasons for things. Didnt he say to short dell when it was 95 or so earlier this year? Maybe if he shorts it again at 95 and then again at 95 and 95 after that one of these days he might actually see it go down to 45. Of course you dont take all the splits into account. He does have some very valid points though. Timing it is the answer.