Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Where the GIT's are going -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stock leader who wrote (176443)	3/23/2009 10:38:30 AM
From: ManyMoose	2 Recommendations Respond to of 225578

I'm not all that into insults, my friend. If you're going to insult me, at least be creative about it.

To: stock leader who wrote (176443)	3/23/2009 10:46:54 AM
From: Oral Roberts	5 Recommendations Respond to of 225578

We don't call people names or insult people on this thread. We are all friends and a social gathering of ladies and gentlemen. Might I suggest you refrain from name calling or insinuation going forward?

To: stock leader who wrote (176443)	3/23/2009 1:19:12 PM
From: sandintoes	9 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 225578

I can assure you Mr. Moose is not dumb, and you are not welcome here if you insult our friends..now behave or leave. You know the rules!

To: stock leader who wrote (176443)	3/23/2009 3:24:22 PM
From: mph	Respond to of 225578

limits on compensation are ALREADY written into IRS code. if an exec is determined to have excess compensation the IRS has a right to re-classify some of it as a dividend and double tax it. You're not describing a limit on compensation, although an IRS decision to reclassify could have a bearing on net take home compensation. I wonder if the IRS went after Franklin Raines or Jamie Gorelick for the millions in compensation the two of them waltzed off with from Fannie Mae. Doubt it.