Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (118057)	3/25/2009 9:14:22 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Knighty, my point is that the bushevics said that education was important, but didn't really do anything beyond leveraging an idea for personal campaign advantage. we'll evaluate Obama's commitment to education by the drop rate in LA Unified. it is currently 50%. let's see what he can do to change that in 4 years. it should be easy for someone who really cares. i will withhold applause until he actually does something, though. he's lied about so many things to date that i don't trust any of his words.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (118057)	3/27/2009 2:24:24 AM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Militarily, he has shifted the emphasis to the two Stans and away from Iraq, where we never should have been. That's what Rumsfeld wanted to do and got fired for. I don't know if replacing Bush with Rummy is progress. <<< On Nov. 6, 2006, a day before the midterm elections, Rumsfeld sent a memo to the White House. In the memo Rumsfeld acknowledged, "Clearly, what U.S. forces are currently doing in Iraq is not working well enough or fast enough." The rest of his memo sounded very much like the emerging troop-drawdown conclusions of the Iraq Study Group report. The first 80 percent of Rumsfeld's memo addressed "Illustrative Options," including his preferred—or "above the line"—options like "an accelerated drawdown of U.S. bases…to five by July 2007" and withdrawal of U.S. forces "from vulnerable positions—cities, patrolling, etc….so the Iraqis know they have to pull up their socks, step up and take responsibility for their country." Finally, Rumsfeld had begun to listen to his generals and others who knew which end was up. The hurdle? Bush and Cheney were not about to follow Rumsfeld's example in going wobbly. Like Robert McNamara at a similar juncture during Vietnam, Rumsfeld had to be let go before he caused a president to "lose a war." >>> counterpunch.org Tom