Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (466457)	3/25/2009 9:35:08 PM
From: bentway	1 Recommendation Respond to of 1575538

"If he loses Iraq he will be a one-term president." Only you wingnuts care. No one else gives a hoot. Iraq means tons of money wasted for nothing on a collosal mistake. The quicker it ends, the more America will like it. We really can't get out of that shithole quickly enough..

To: i-node who wrote (466457)	3/26/2009 12:56:40 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575538

So you're saying that Iraq can't survive in peace without an occuping force. Is that what you're telling us? I'm saying that Bush handed Obama a stable Iraq and had any R been elected a reasonable withdrawal strategy would have been pursued which insured that stability would continue. Twenty five people were killed in Iraq last weekend in a suicide bombing attack. And you think that's frigging stability??? If so, you are more delusional that I thought. If Obama withdraws troops precipitously, of course the situation could deteriorate. He has been cautioned time and again about this. Obama is giving it what 14 months? If that's not enough time for Iraq to be prepared, then it ain't ever going to happen. If he loses Iraq he will be a one-term president. Like with most things, you have that backwards.