SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (466499)3/26/2009 9:10:00 AM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576806
 
If you just make null and void the highly leveraged CDSs (insurance) then you eliminate the huge liabilities that companies like AIG have accrued.

But then the banks have to absorb the losses from the defaulting assets...how does that help the situation?

Al



To: Road Walker who wrote (466499)3/26/2009 9:40:45 AM
From: bentway1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576806
 
I think at the least they should declare that CDS's issued as pure bets won't be paid. That is, CDS's that can't be directly linked to a security owned by the holder of the CDS.



To: Road Walker who wrote (466499)3/26/2009 9:55:16 AM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576806
 
Yes but the base assets for the collateralized mortgages are housing prices, and it's pretty difficult to prop them up.

Right...and these are 1 to 1...

If you just make null and void the highly leveraged CDSs (insurance) then you eliminate the huge liabilities that companies like AIG have accrued.

youtube.com

It may be why Geithner wants the power to take over non banks...

Al