Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nycnpbbkr who wrote (6627)	10/26/1997 12:15:00 PM
From: BillyG	Respond to of 25960

Keep your comments coming. I appreciate them. I like Ian's comments too. Each person on the thread has to decide the weight to give to comments posted here. You've earned your credibility, as far as I'm concerned. Published articles are nice to have, but they don't establish absolute credibility. Take Barrons, for example . . . I'm not too worried about the dispute between you and Ian, though. We're talking about two lasers now. If this market grows for CYMI in the future, it's icing on the cake.

To: nycnpbbkr who wrote (6627)	10/26/1997 12:40:00 PM
From: rwh	Respond to of 25960

NYC--you are one of the MOST credible posters on the thread and your input is highly valued by all. Your orginal post on the HP issue did not state absolutely that UTEK presently uses Cymer lasers for fab; it was an "either ... or" statement regarding a PAST event: "Cymer lasers have been used for Hewlett Packard inkjet printer head fabrication or R&D in the past. (HP -- Also in Rancho Bernardo)" [NYCNPBBKR Post #6244]. Ian's post (#6252) does not appear to deal with the "...or R&D..." possibility. Through discussion, the facts were made known to the thread; perhaps a little heat was generated with the light, but everyone got the truth and therein lies the thread's purpose. The point is, you are both credible posters whom the thread admirers and values.

To: nycnpbbkr who wrote (6627)	10/26/1997 9:02:00 PM
From: jpmac	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 25960

>>off-topic<< ken: i, also, have enjoyed both your's and ian's posts. finding your views to be of value. i certainly hope this disagreement will not keep you from posting your points. there have been unfortunate remarks made on both sides. and as he seems to have drawn, or at least suggested, conclusions about your motives, the piece you post here (either posted or e-mailed to you, i assume) draws conclusions as to ian's motives. it would good to see the whole thing concluded with you both continuing to offer your insights. i read the semi-blood thread and noted your reference to sun-tzu. as traders seem to make you cringe, the interest in the "art of war" in the financial and business communities makes me cringe. i've posted this link for you. i find it a far preferable way of life. no commentary intended, just thought i'd pass it along. aikiweb.com jp