SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (298311)3/26/2009 6:01:47 PM
From: LindyBill5 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793782
 
The Bible provides us with a rich definition of greed.

Religion has been one of the major antagonists of Capitalism for eons. The reason the Bible's definition is so "rich" is that it's description of "greed" is a series of adjectives bad-mouthing self interest. No real definition. Christianity considers self interest/selfishness to be a sin.

One of the major reasons for the "Dark Ages" of Christendom was that the Church's hatred of "pursuing your own happiness" stopped all banking by making interest a "sin." It was only after Calvin promoted the concept of knowing wither you were going to heaven by how well you did in life [he promoted this idea when he wasn't burning heretics at the stake in Geneva] that Capitalism took off.

The greedy will use deception to acquire material goods. The greedy will lie and use false pretenses to acquired goods at the expense of others.

There are moral and immoral pursuits of happiness. When you succeed with a moral one, you make a profit. Succeed with an immoral one, you have plunder. Combining the two, as the Religious did here, was a successful attempt to bad mouth Capitalism. The difference is the method used. One is a moral method, the other is a criminal one.

I define PROFIT as "a moral increase in happiness."



To: DMaA who wrote (298311)3/27/2009 3:25:11 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 793782
 
"Greed" seems to be defined as "bad self interest", rather than something wholly different than self-interest.

Defined that way greed seems to be bad by definition, but then the idea that "greed is bad" becomes just an uninformative tautology.

I don't think "obsession with accumulating material goods" is a good definition because people can be greedy without actually being obsessed.