SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Skywatcher who wrote (52671)3/27/2009 3:42:10 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
LOL:

Message 25528668

DAK



To: Skywatcher who wrote (52671)3/27/2009 6:17:59 PM
From: Mac Con Ulaidh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Good article. and it has a couple of quotes from Obama that show the hopeful beginnings of change over time. It was good to reread them after a slight flare-up of worry after the townhall answer. And Holder will have a role, as well.

this from an article from a meeting with Holbrooke after today's Afgan speech -

But at the end of the briefing, Holbrooke did speak somewhat candidly about a vexing part of the Afghanistan problem: drugs. What to do about the opium flowing out of Afghanistan has always been a knotty element of US policy regarding Afghanistan. How much of a priority should it be? (Simply put, if you attack the the opium trade, warlords and locals get pissed off and join or support the other side.) Asked about the priority of drug fighting in the Afghanistan review, Holbrooke, as he was leaving the briefing, said "We're going to have to rethink the drug problem." That was interesting. He went on: "a complete rethink." He noted that the policymakers who had worked on the Afghanistan review "didn't come to a firm, final conclusion" on the opium question. "It's just so damn complicated," Holbrooke explained. Did that mean that the opium eradication efforts in Afghanistan should be canned? "You can't eliminate the whole eradication program," he exclaimed. But that remark did make it seem that he backed an easing up of some sort. "You have to put more emphasis on the agricultural sector," he added.

For years, officials of the US government and other government have pondered what to do about the poppy fields of Afghanistan. Holbrooke indicated he favors a significant shift in this front of the war on drugs. But what specific policy does he fancy? He offered no clues, and then began talking to several reporters in French. Whatever he was saying, it sounded quite good.


rest of article -

motherjones.com



To: Skywatcher who wrote (52671)3/28/2009 3:23:11 PM
From: ChinuSFO  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 149317
 
The resolution of the Iran situation is a big first step in the ME situation. The next step for O is taming thenation gone wild: Israel.
=================================
Brown offers Iran ‘test case’ deal on nuclear power

LONDON (IRNA) – Prime Minister Gordon Brown was set Tuesday to offer to help Iran to develop nuclear power for civilian use within the framework of United Nations rules.

In what is being described as a timely diplomatic intervention, Brown was expected to call for “a new international system” to help non-nuclear states peacefully acquire the new sources of energy in order to wean them off fossil fuels and cut carbon emission.

“Iran is a test case for this new philosophy of the right to civil nuclear power with sanctions for rule breakers,” he was due to say in an address to Lancaster House, according to advance extracts of his speech. “Let me be unequivocal: Iran has the same absolute right to a peaceful civil nuclear program as any other country. Indeed the UK and international community stand ready to help Iran achieve it,” the British premier was quoted saying.

His speech is his first on the issue since holding talks with new U.S. President Barack Obama, who has offered to change policy and open a dialogue with Iran.

“I hope that Iran will make the right choice and take advantage of the international community’s willingness to negotiate, including President Obama’s offer of engagement, rather than face further sanctions and regional instability,” Brown was set to say.

Europe, America and Russia have a standing offer to help Iran with a civil nuclear power program if it accepts all-out UN inspections among other things, but that offer has made no progress.

The initiative was expected to be in the context of warning that the world will fail to tackle climate change without building dozens of nuclear power plants.

Brown’s speech also reiterates many of the principles of the negotiations with Iran, under which world powers offered a significant set of incentives.

His new approach reportedly includes offering Iran a “clear choice” while insisting once again that its current nuclear program remains “unacceptable.”

tehrantimes.com