SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (298786)3/29/2009 11:22:58 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 794298
 
I can't say I disagree much with his analysis. However, I think he minimizes the importance of training. The services need to move away from alignment of equipment, toward the alignment of mission. Navigation is navigation, whether it be surface, or submerged. The same holds true of many other areas common to the Army, Air Force, Marines and Navy (like logistics, specific weapons systems, leadership, etc). Despite talk in the past, the services have barely scratched the surface of sharing resources.

The waste is huge.

Government can play a very important role, such as the role ADL has been playing setting standards, adlnet.gov. Setting standards, allow resources to be cross utilized. But the challenge is huge and the IT talent is severely lacking, along with the leadership. There's no Google operating in this realm and the services could use one.

We take for granted the benefits a company like Microsoft provided when computer architecture was in its infancy. Often, a dominant leader helps to clarify the direction an industry should head. That hasn't been true in the computer based training field. So many players, so many standards, the sands shift continuously, adding to cost as everyone attempts to become the proprietary leader.

The same must be true in the medical database management arena. No standard, so everyone is trying to be the next Microsoft OS of the Health Care system.



To: LindyBill who wrote (298786)3/30/2009 6:04:34 AM
From: unclewest2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 794298
 
I see a future in which the small-wars force (more Army and Marines) experiences continued significant growth in its global workload, while the big-war force (more Navy and Air Force) experiences the opposite.

LOL. He is losing it. Can you imagine the navy fighting a major land campaign in a place like Afghanistan or anywhere else for that matter?.

Our big war force is the Army and Air Force.