Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New QUALCOMM - Coming Into Buy Range -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CrackheadBob who wrote (4943)	3/29/2009 6:17:39 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer	Respond to of 9128

Good point, and thanks for the clarification. I was considering only one aspect of the process, where an applicant called "B" cites prior art invented by "A" in order to show how and why "B" has a new and novel method. But I also see your point that "B" might also have to rely on "A" to sell a product that uses "B." Is there any more detail on the QCOM patent and how it differs from the ITT patent, or whether it differs from the ITT in enough respects to be considered novel and non obvious? Art