Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (23296)	10/26/1997 3:59:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

E Trade: If you had done any DD on IPM at all, you would know that Rooster Cogburn and Nyal Nyquil were invited by IPM to review the basis for their claims. They refused by not agreeing to sign a confidentiality statement. If you had done any DD on IPM at all, you would know that Behre Dolbear has ALREADY signed off that there is gold at Black Rock. So, we have the word of an independent mining consultant who has been working with thousands of samples of Black Rock dirt for years, against the word of a couple of mining musuem curators who had a couple of samples taken. I know who I am betting on, and it ain't mining musuem curators, and it sure ain't the syndicate of your imagination.

To: E. Charters who wrote (23296)	10/26/1997 4:01:00 PM
From: CRISP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

<< THEY ALL GOT NUMBER TOO.>> Better flush twice.<eom>

To: E. Charters who wrote (23296)	10/26/1997 5:09:00 PM
From: Daniel M. Whipple	Respond to of 35569

E.C., "The Door is Open. If we disagree on assays I will invite him to try again, when I am sure I can get a good cut and split under supervision of course." Are you saying that Coggins wouldn't have Carte Blanche to take whatever sample and assay he wants? You mean if the results were not what you obtained, he would cooperate on sample location,depth,varing assays! Suppose he wouldn't cooperate once he got you under the eight ball? OH! You would use REASONING with him! I was actually beginning to give you some credit for what you were spouting,not anymore! You need a Reality Check. LOL on your Cartel! HA! BULL! Daniel

To: E. Charters who wrote (23296)	10/27/1997 1:48:00 AM
From: Lew Green	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

By your own criterea, if you were a stock Mr. Charters, you wouldn't buy you. <<But you are too interested in calling me on one small detail, the overexaggeration of one mining company's potential.>> It was not a small detail. It was not "one mining company" but your own tout. Do you often overexagerate? You mention needing 20,000 investors, sounds like you don't even have a going concern. <<Don't fall in love too easy.>> I didn't, I was dragged kicking and screaming into Jr miners from biotech. And my first responce to the PhD investor who told me about IPM was "goldmine... probably a scam" ... Of course I wouldn't be foolish enough to post that with no evidence -- that's the turf of stock/short promoters/manipulators. I did conduct 3 months of research including site visits, interviews with 5 memebers of co mgmt., phone calls and correspondence around the globe to analysts, brokers, metalurgists, chemists, geologists and geophysicists. Then I bought shares, several times. You seem to be falling in hate too easily, isn't that also foolish? You have no evidence. Can't answer any detailed questions, I must assume the brash statements that can't be backed up are also gross exagerations as you've confessed to above. <<Mason Coggins. I am not saying his work was pervasive and beyond reproach.>> I see. Then pray tell _what_ are you basing your adamant and unqualified defamatory statements against IPM on? <<am too realistic to think that all gov't geos are interested in finding a mine.>> I don't think Mr. Coggins is a geologist. Sorry. <<But he was adamant that the material was barren.>> Adamant? Sounds like a phone call. When did you speak to him? Can't you call him back and get the hard data I requested? <<He can sample my claims any day of the week>> You've come to trust him? <<If we disagree on assays I will invite him to try again, when I am sure I can get a good cut and split under supervision of course.>> Don't you think it unfair he didn't offer IPM such? No "good cut and supervised splits", no second attempts, and most critically -- no _drilling_, no samples from the actual deposit. Isn't that brilliant? And the TSE's -- the same story -- and it was done by Kilborn! Guess what they did in the past -- the check assays and reserve calculations for Bre-x that ultimately cost investors fortunes -- one right here -- who's been through hell and back and is very long IPM. <<If the gold is there it's there.>> And will always assay easy. Let's cut the BS... this whole DD thing is about difficult to assay ore. Refractory and or micro-clustered ore. Possibly nano-cluster ore though I don't think so. You obviously know nothing about this. I know it took you until your forties to graduate from a Canadian mining school, but still if you pay attention perhaps you will learn. Like any good "scam" IPM has hired 2700 man deep Batemen, the engineering firm with the most hands-on in-house scientists, and I am told that as we speak they are working on IPM ore in thier lab analyzing and breaking it down practically to the molecule to determine _exactly_ what we've got in terms of chemistry. The only entity behaving like a scam frankly is you. Why don't you lay out exactly what you have and don't have without exageration. Tell us when you last spoke to Mr. Coggins, what he told you, and what hard evidence or verifiable dates, facts, names and numbers back it up? <<By the way I have several. I have had perhaps 50 gov't geos out on my properties and more companies.>> Mr. Charters, your credibility is already weak with the exagerations, why can't you stick to posting things you can back up. Could you name half the geologists and contact numbers? Could you name the 50 companies -- surely there are records of all this? <<It's funny how when they took samples in my samples areas where I got kicks, THEY ALL GOT NUMBER TOO.>> That's miraculous. So you've had _over_ 50 mining companies and ore bodies, and _never_ missed! Again, I think you wouldn't buy you. <<For 20 years. Every property.>> Like I said, sounds fantastic. Are still over-exagerating in a post confessing to previous over-exageration? Again, the assay aspect is irrelevant. None of use think IPM's dirt can be "easily" repeatably assayed in an off-the-shelf fashion. A lot of the cash the DDs have spent has been on coming up with custom assays. Time will tell on that. There's a mine in Fiji that still can't assay it's ore -- and has been cranking out metal for decades. Barrick on the Carlin trend still can't acurately assay its "invisible gold". And yes, there are and have been scams, and fwiw Bre-x had no trouble at all assaying its ore -- most scams don't. We know IPM is not a scam. Behre Dolbear knows it's not a scam -- for 3 years now. They've got potentially rich, "ore behaving badly"; and we are days away from finding out if it's finally been tamed. Lew Green