Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (467876)	4/1/2009 1:54:14 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577853

Fine, but I believe you overstate his contribution to the current economic mess.......a bit unfairly I might add. And I am no fan of Bill Clinton. I don't think it's unfair. Bush was certainly worse. No doubt. But the Dems have certainly been influenced by the banksters over the last 15 years or so. I am going to have to knitpick. The word you used to describe Clinton's contribution to the current economic mess wass "huge". IMO that word describes Bush's contribution. With Clinton, I think that word is an exaggeration considering that his contribution was signing off on two bills that would have passed with or without his signature. And let's not forget the subprime debacle which started the current economic crisis rolling occurred mostly if not completely under Bush's watch. In fact, credit swaps and CDOs didn't really flourish until well into the Bush administration. As for banksters influencing Dems, you're probably right but I don't see how that contributed significantly to the current economic mess.