Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fastpathguru who wrote (259333)	4/1/2009 4:13:11 PM
From: Mahmoud Mohammed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Mr Guru, Re: " ... the playing field is level, AMD's problems are and have been solely a result of their own product and business performance ..." BARK-Y-LOUNGER BARK-Y-LOUNGER BARK-Y-LOUNGER BARK-Y-LOUNGER BARK-Y-LOUNGER BARK-Y-LOUNGER Mahmoud

To: fastpathguru who wrote (259333)	4/1/2009 4:59:39 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Respond to of 275872

Sony, NEC, Fujitsu, Fujitsu-Siemens all dropped or significantly reduced AMD in '03. Toshiba and Gateway already had, during the K7 era. IBM, early on a major supporter of x86-64, suddenly went cold on the architecture in '03. So you have no documentation to support this claim. Why don't you just admit it and stop making claims you can't support. the JFTC ruling is not comprehensive in a global economy and could not "create a level playing field" on its own Of course but it would have leveled the playing field in Japan. Can you show where there was any increase in MSS in Japan following the JFTC ruling? I never said that Intel's abuse of monopoly power is the only thing that affects the market. The abuse of monopoly power is a fantasy but thanks for admitting there are other factors at play. One would expect incompetence and blundering to show some effect. My claims are embodied in the AMD lawsuit and will stand or fall on that case's merits, and I have never claimed otherwise. Your claims are instead accusations and not one single company has stepped forward to corroborate those accusations, in fact quite the opposite.