Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AlphaRomero who wrote (64634)	4/2/2009 5:41:12 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78419

Per cubic metre it's actually 9.48 ozs Ag [98g/t, rock s.g. 3.0], that's usd122/m3 there, then Zn at 2.79% would be 184.5lbs at .59 = usd109, 122 + 109 = usd231/m3, or usd77/t ... pretty healthy for right from surface, in an area directly across a fault from a big oxide zinc open pit, likely part of the pit shell in any case, in a very low cost jurisdiction [edit] - aha, you revised that estimate, yes 70/t is much closer ... should wait until after edit time is up before replying to anything, old SI trick -g- ... 2.79% of 2204.6lbs would be 61.5lbs/t usa.v - any idea what's driving this puppy to remain undriven? ... b-bands getting quite pinched here