SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Renee Scherb who wrote (1867)10/27/1997 12:01:00 AM
From: sea_biscuit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42834
 
RE: "Analysts caution that [Dow dogs] investments, whether funds or trusts, may yet become victims of their increasing popularity ... So far this year, the three mutual funds and the ML trust that started on Jan 2 have underperformed the S&P 500 ..."

The underperformance should not come as a surprise. The strategy has a higher average return than the Dow but also a much higher Standard Deviation than the Dow. So there could be occasional instances of underperformance, even severe underperformance.

An analyst is quoted as warning that the dogs may lag the market, "If the Dow dog strategy becomes too popular, it will lose its contrarian edge. The key to the strategy working is that it's based on buying overlooked, unpopular stocks."

I am not surprised. The strategy usually gets noticed by the people (and gets investment magazines' attention, not to mention the attention of radio "goddesses"!) after it has performed well! And investors who jump in, usually abandon it after it underperforms the market a year or two (one of the variants of the Dow Dogs strategy -- the Foolish Four, has underperformed the Dow as many as 7 times in the last 26 years, and yet outperformed it by a factor of 8.3 to 1).

It is a very difficult strategy to follow, especially when it's underperforming and the whole world is beckoning you with all those attractive alternatives. Often the greatest outperformance comes immediately after underperformance (at which point most investors would have deserted it).

As for popularity, it is nowhere near the S&P 500 index funds. So one need not have too many worries on that score.

Maybe we have the goddess to thank for spreading the word too widely? <g> In any event, I'm shy of any "system" for buying stocks, whether it's called the Nifty Fifty or Dow Dogs. Best bet, IMO, is either to buy the market (BB's beloved indexes) or be a selective picker of stocks you really know and understand. Each to his own!


"Selective" picking, while sounding nice, often introduces emotions such as hope, and wishful thinking into the stock-selection process. It is usually better if the stock comes to you than for you to go looking for it. At least that's my opinion!

Dipy.