Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (48285)	4/8/2009 4:10:33 AM
From: Maurice Winn	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218660

There is some merit in those points ElM. But given the history of men being "in charge" = at least on public affairs, with WWI, Boer War, Japan's invasions, Pol Pot, and back through history in all societies, it's not clear that women having a major democratic influence is bad. It is definitely skewing society off into another direction, but that could be good. On women running businesses, it's nearly always, if not always [I can't think of an exception and Body Shop doesn't count], some bloke who gets it going young and builds it up over his life, hands it on and over about 2 or 3 generations it goes into decline and demise. The companies usually reach their zenith under the care of the original bloke, though there is often some momentum carry-over for a generation after they get too old. Mqurice