SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TEDennis who wrote (7153)10/27/1997 10:10:00 AM
From: Hoatzin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13949
 
TED/tom, a Bemer quickie for you:
The Briefing article states the pricing to be "around $0.15 cents (sic) per line of object code."

Now, it's been a while, but my recollection is that object modules don't have "lines", they are just files with variable length records. Looking at or counting "records" or "lines" in an object module has no meaning. They have "size", and a particular instruction is at an offset or displacement within the file, but you can't assign a line number. I suppose one could charge by the K-byte of object size, but by the line?

What say you? There are several places in this article where I know the writer doesn't know what he is talking about. Is this another one?

Kevin



To: TEDennis who wrote (7153)10/27/1997 9:17:00 PM
From: tom rusnak  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13949
 
ted,

very good. you sure you dont want to un-retire and just evaluate y2k packages for a living? got that p/390 installed on your verandah yet?

mmmm....i'd have to hope that they've considered that. perhaps for vertex programs they extend the meaning of valid numerics. i dont believe that they use 'c','d','e' for zones eliminating the capital letters but lower case characters could be lower case characters or bigits, but nobody uses lower case anymore do they?

looks like there are a lot of issues to deal with when modifying data. i'd like to think that some ex-ibm'er somewhere considers user interface issues and doesnt just worry about results achieved in the laboratory,

thanks,

t

actually it is a lovely spring day here as well.