SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (469799)4/8/2009 1:52:53 PM
From: jlallen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1574683
 
Dance, spin, bob and weave.

You are projecting again.

Its not pretty.



To: combjelly who wrote (469799)4/8/2009 1:57:35 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1574683
 
Wrong again. I knew exactly what I was talking about when I stated:

"Had you said blood sucking mosquitoes don’t have teeth, we would know you meant all mosquitoes not just some mosquitoes. But, you would have been wrong about that also, since mosquitoes have 47 teeth."

I was prepared to back that statement up with a detailed description offered by entomologists, the text of which I had read and the pdf file includes detailed pictoral descriptions as well, or I wouldn't have made such a statement.

You leaped before you looked and said they are insects so they couldn't have teeth. You were just plain wrong about that. But you made several attempts to cover your mistake instead of admitting you didn't know something... tsk

I was not confused about what the teeth were, as you claimed. As stated, I had already reviewed the documentation. You were wrong about that.

I didn't think they were like other teeth, as you claimed in your virus analogy, you were wrong about that,

You falsely stated I was claiming they were like other animal teeth, that was just bad manners and dishonest... tsk

You don't admit it when you are wrong as you've previously claimed, you were wrong about that too.