SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (469867)4/8/2009 4:46:21 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1574685
 
Nonsense, that isn't even about mosquitos. You are dishonoring every argument you could make about any topic by discrediting yourself in this way.

The source document I used was not written for sixth graders, it was written for persons in an advanced study of entomology. They use the term tooth and teeth repeatedly. They go into great detail in describing the structures and functions, so there should be no confusion between teeth of other creatures and teeth of mosquitos. That allegation was just CJs lame attempt to cover his error. If you look at the source document you will see elaborate drawings developed for advanced level of study


Yes, you're right to a degree. The mosquitoes don't have mandibles nor do they have teeth. They have what's called a proboscis which is injected into their victims and allows them to suck their blood. While the proboscis is serrated like a knife in order to pierce the skin, you would hardly call them teeth. Now had you thought this thing through you would realize that mosquitoes don't chew; they pierce and suck. And nature is rarely inefficient when it dispenses tools to its beings and rarely does it over-equip those beings.

"As with many members of the mosquito family, the female is equipped with an elongated proboscis that she uses to collect blood to feed her eggs."

en.wikipedia.org

So you need to apologize to CJ. Pronto!