Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (470101)	4/9/2009 3:22:17 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575596

"Good, then we agree gay marriage should be legal because the state has no business in peoples bedrooms." I don't care one way or the other. I have been exploring the rationale behind making gay marriage legal. The demand that gay marriage be a legal classification is not sound based on the reasons given. However, we do not agree on the issue and you have contradicted yourself. Making Gay Marriage a legal status makes it the business of the state. But that sounds very left wing of you. If that was your goal, you've succeeded.

To: Road Walker who wrote (470101)	4/9/2009 3:46:44 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575596

"To get out of this stupid fuking conversation... which is my intention right now." The libs on this thread are such wimps. I'm tempted to take your side sometimes just because I feel sorry for you. I promise I will do that, if you ever pick an issue I agree with. Some of you seem like nice people.

To: Road Walker who wrote (470101)	4/9/2009 3:59:38 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575596

RW, > Good, then we agree gay marriage should be legal because the state has no business in peoples bedrooms. Wouldn't that be a reason why the state shouldn't recognize any form of marriage whatsoever? Tenchusatsu