Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (259665)	4/10/2009 4:02:22 PM
From: wbmw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Re: Diligent or not, all AMD needs is a sympathetic judge and a few "experts" that will testify under oath that the Intel monopoly is adding $100 to the cost of every PC. No, they'll need quite a bit more than that, because in a court of law, you need to PROVE that harm has been done. Even Jackie Childs from Seinfeld needed Cramer to show the coffee burns on his skin in order to have a case (which disappeared after using "the balm"). The law is fairly well defined, and short of the OEMs themselves taking the stand, I don't think any "expert" testimony from Neal Nelson, Dan3, or anyone of similar ambiguous credibility is going to count.