To: Sully- who wrote (71069 ) 4/12/2009 12:00:37 AM From: Sully- Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947 AP at it again on Warming National Review Institute Blog A large Arctic ice mass loss in 2007 was widely reported as proof of man-made global warming, even though NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratories attributed it instead to unusual winds. Now, as a April 7, Associated Press story by Seth Borenstein affirms, the massive 2008 gain of Arctic ice mass is being presented not as recovery, but used to perpetuate the meme of a melting Arctic. That piece, “Arctic sea ice thinnest ever going into spring”, opens with “The Arctic is treading on thinner ice than ever before.” Outside of the improper use of “ever” in the two spots that will be read by the most readers, nowhere does the piece misstate facts; instead, it presents them in the direst light. For example, it states “more than 90 percent of the sea ice in the Arctic is only 1 or 2 years old. That makes it thinner and more vulnerable than at anytime in the past three decades.” It seems unlikely that any but the keenest uninitiated reader would glean from this that the story is really reporting massive ice mass gain. As mentioned in this space before, when it comes to this specific issue, the “on record” means since 1979. Although it is rarely laid out as merely being three decades — that truth is available, if not emphasized in the AP story — the even more salient point rarely makes its way into the piece, that these measurements began at the end of the coldest decade of the century. AP does not disclose this , even though that perspective is essential. Unless and until the media flip back into “global cooling” mode the message will almost always remain that the planet is warming and ice mass decreasing. So, when reading such coverage, be aware that what’s being obscured is that we have never had so much new ice given the massive 2008 recovery, with now hundreds of thousands of square kilometers more Arctic ice mass more than the year before – and globally, what we would call “average” levels since measurements began. nrinstitute.org