SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dale Baker who wrote (34148)4/12/2009 4:13:33 PM
From: Spekulatius1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78666
 
These media outlets have collaborated with the packagers and sellers of those papers to achieve the desired result. The packaged loans could not have been sold without that opinion from those rating agencies. If gross negligence or even collaboration for fraud can be proven then I think a fraud case could be made. Even if the outcome of a fraud case would negative, it would be helpful to show in much detail how the sausage was made. Court cases are good for that. That could lead to either nobody wanting those sort of sausages any more or better sausages in the future.

I had the same hope after the Y2002/2003 Enron/Worldcom disasters where rating agencies played a role as well. Obviously more head on sticks are needed.



To: Dale Baker who wrote (34148)4/12/2009 4:32:12 PM
From: Little Joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78666
 
Why wouldn't the ratings agencies have a legal obligation to the financial institutions they provided the opinions to. If the financial institutions were sued, why couldn't they 3rd party the ratings institutions. I have no expertise in the area, but I think it seems reasonable.

lj