Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (470956)	4/12/2009 4:18:29 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575174

>> Also,,the tortures were much more than waterboarding..... There is no evidence of ANY torture, period. It would be interesting, however, if there were a poll asking the American People would they support the use of waterboarding (with the procedure fully described, accompanied by the fact that the subject is uninjured by the process and it lasts only seconds, typically). Particularly, in the instance where the detainee is a person who was deeply involved with 9/11 and is likely to be able to provide information which will help prevent future attacks. You'd get a 70/30 support for it, with the 30 being only the left-wing extremists. I'd wager on it.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (470956)	4/12/2009 6:31:37 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575174

"Also,,the tortures were much more than waterboarding....." You've spend years and years posting allegations, innuendo, and smirs about Bush. You've had to be right once in a while in your wild speculative fishing for something. It would be nice if just once you could back something up with a fact. If there were tortures, and I figure like you that must have been some abuse someplace with an active military the size of ours, where is your evidence? What torture?