Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (48553)	4/13/2009 2:23:11 AM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217588

ElM, taking over Brazil would be problematic for the USA, the same as Great Britain taking over all those countries which then started shipping evil-doers back to them. Enoch Powell pointed out the problems which would arise and did. Britain long ago slammed the portcullis down. The USA would NOT want to have hordes of Amazonian pirates moving into the USA. The USA could take over NZ and it would be a good fit for them and would reduce their problems, not increase them. It would be a handy summer holiday place for a start. The point though is TJ thinking that China could get their grubby mitts on it. I was pointing out that the USA would not find that desirable from a strategic point of view. It is preferable for the USA border with China to be in the China Sea between Taiwan and China, not just off the coast of USA. Mqurice