Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (259691)	4/13/2009 6:01:57 PM
From: wbmw	Respond to of 275872

Re: Another way of saying they aren't Nehalema(sic) If you are gong to nit-pick on codenames, then the Xeon 5500 series isn't Nehalem, either. It's called Gainestown. And the Core i7 isn't Nehalem, either. It's called Bloomfield. The fact is that all of these chips, including Clarkfield and Arrandale, are based on the same Nehalem micro-architecture. Re: and they aren't here - which is what I posted. LOL, you may want to pay attention to the conversation, because you sure as hell didn't post anything of the sort. This is the verbatim text, starting with you fawning over a 2011 AMD Fusion part, and ending with you claiming that a 2010 Nehalem-based part isn't a notebook chip, because "they aren't here" - as if a 2011 AMD Fusion part is any more "here". Dan3: New AMD Mobile CPUs/GPUs coming with DirectX 11 and bga form factor to support ultra-light notebooks. wbmw: In 2011? Won't Intel be ramping the generation after Nehalem by then? Dan3: Nehalem isn't a notebook chip wbmw: Nehalem will have two mobile variants, both Clarksfield (45nm quad core) and Arrandale (32nm dual core with CPU graphics). Dan3: Another way of saying they aren't Nehalema and they aren't here - which is what I posted.