Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nextrade! who wrote (196226)	4/14/2009 12:31:00 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 306849

>>But where this is not possible, and banks require substantial additional resources from the government, we will hold accountable those responsible<< ROTFLPIMP! How much jail time (cumulative) has been amassed "by those responsible"? How many CEO's and BOD's who were "responsible" are still in office. This is a sick fcuking joke!<NG>

To: nextrade! who wrote (196226)	4/14/2009 3:27:05 PM
From: DebtBomb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

1. All those loser banks and wall streeters should have failed. That's capitalism and you'll never fix anything by rewarding the losers, IMO. They've been given a bailout to continue on their merry way, IMO. 2. They do not know what would happened if the losers failed. If the losers would have failed, we'd probably be on our way to recovery instead of this slow drip economic agony. Most times when you let the losers fail, the smartest....the survivors become stronger, the market weeds out the losers. We don't want losers running anything. That's not capitalism. They should fail. Confidence is shot when the losers get rewarded. 3. I know lot's of people that had NO problem getting a loan over the last several months to buy foreclosures or cars. None. What's with all of this: credit is frozen crap? I'm calling BS on that.