SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (63158)4/16/2009 10:51:33 AM
From: Bald Eagle1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224729
 
She should resign



To: longnshort who wrote (63158)4/16/2009 7:00:47 PM
From: MJ2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224729
 
Witch hunting.

What has this nation come to when Ms. Napalitano sinks to this level of government name calling.

Catholics beware

Reagans supporters of the 1980's be ware

Animal rights activist

Cancer survivors

Returning military

Blue eyed white people

Blue eyed black people

Brown eyed white people

Brown eyed black people

Texans

Minnesotans

Virginians

Californians

Yes she should resign.

Presbyterians

Buddhists

Methodist

Jehovah Witness

Obama Acorns

All of the above beware of Napolitano's heavy hand.

Why Napolitano should resign:

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Wednesday that she was briefed before the release of a controversial intelligence assessment and that she stands by the report, which lists returning veterans among terrorist risks to the U.S.

But the top House Democrat with oversight of the Department of Homeland Security said in a letter to Ms. Napolitano that he was "dumbfounded" that such a report would be issued.

"This report appears to raise significant issues involving the privacy and civil liberties of many Americans - including war veterans," said Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, in his letter sent Tuesday night.

The letter was representative of a public furor over the nine-page document since its existence was reported in The Washington Times on Tuesday.