SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (71179)4/17/2009 2:56:52 AM
From: Sully-1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
Dear Mr. President: Send Us Your Junk and the Texans Will Stand Tall!

By Chris Burgard on US Border Patrol
Nig Hollywood

The first time you face armed, foreign troops on American soil, something inside you changes. You experience a cold, hard sensation deep in your core. There is an internal shift as the reality sinks in that despite having the strongest military in the world, there are Americans who are not safe on their home soil.

      

Obama and Mexican President Calderón

I experienced that shift on a cold October night in 2005, when, at a distance of approximately 21 yards, we filmed armed, uniformed soldiers escorting a mule train into the United States.

Guardsmen from Tennessee experienced it in the same location 15 months later when soldiers from Mexico advanced on their observation post. The foreign troops twice attempted to flank the Guardsmen. The Guardsmen were twice ordered to observe and fall back until reinforcements arrived.

Countless rank and file Border Patrol agents have been experiencing the same thing for years, far more intensely. They just aren’t allowed to talk about it openly.

The deputies of the Hudspeth County Sheriff’s department and Texas State Troopers shared that experience on Jan. 23, 2006 when Mexican military troops crossed 200 yards into Texas. The Mexican troops held off US law enforcement while they retrieved one drug laden SUV, unloaded and then burned a second.

During this standoff, Mexican soldiers were filmed flanking the deputies and taking cover in the riverside brush. A cartel member is seen removing the hat off of one of the soldiers, presumably so that his insignia could not be seen. That visual clearly illustrated that the soldier was working for and taking orders from, the Narco Soldados.

True to their courage and integrity, US Border Patrol agents raced to stand alongside their fellow law officers, but they were soon called off by their supervisors. The Border Patrol agents were ordered to pull back from the confrontation. That memory still lingers in parts of Texas. The Texans are ready to go it alone if need be, all they ask is for President Obama to give them access to military surplus equipment.

Just last week, Hudspeth County deputies, my cousin Shawn, and I stood on the banks of the Rio Grande at that same crossing when gunfire broke out across the river from us. A lot of gunfire. Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws on the planet. When sustained semi-automatic gunfire erupts in Mexico, it is the Cartels, the Military, or both.

The Cartel’s have their own private armies and unlimited financial resources.

The Zetas are one of the best financed private armies in the world. They have helicopters, submersibles, and state of the art encrypted communications equipment. Seized Zeta weapons have included South Korean hand grenades, rocket launchers and 60 millimeter mortars.

Contrary to what the current administration would have you believe, you cannot buy 60 millimeter mortars at Wal Mart. Not even in Texas.

The Hudspeth County Sheriff’s department is like many other counties in Texas: They do not have enough body armor for their personnel and they do not have automatic rifles. Many of the semi automatic rifles that the men carry were purchased at their own expense.

Sheriff West has already spent three times last year’s ammunition budget in the first three months of 2009. He is having difficulty acquiring more ammunition for his men. “Give us your junk,” Sheriff West asks President Obama.

He would love to take a shopping trip through the military’s surplus before it goes to auction. He needs air support, weapons, ammunition, body armor, generators, bulldozers, tractors, 4×4 vehicles, gasoline, diesel fuel, ground sensors, surveillance equipment, communications equipment, and MREs.

This is also true in Brooks County, Texas. Sheriff Rodriguez often has to ask the manager of his local sporting goods store for discounts on ammunition in order for his men to be able to afford to practice. Brooks County deputies make about $24,000 per year. To effectively do their job, they use their own money to purchase night vision equipment which retails for about $5,400.

Brooks County Inspector Daniel Davila says that 75% of the crime that they respond to is related to illegal alien and narcotics trafficking. They currently have two and a half semi trailers full of seized narcotics.

At first glance, the Sheriff’s department compound looks like a used care dealership because it is surrounded by over three hundred seized vehicles. The Brooks County Sheriff’s department has recently doubled in size to eight deputies, but Sheriff Rodriguez says that they need at least 15 to 20 more deputies to effectively do their jobs.

He does not believe that it is safe for women to stay by themselves on many of the big ranches in his county. Zeta squads armed with automatic weapons have been sighted on ranches in his county, 69 miles north of the border.

Jeff Davis County Sheriff Rick McIvon has two officers to cover 2,250 miles. Not long ago, 40 miles north of the border on his father-in-law’s ranch, men wearing black, their heads covered in ski masks, ambushed a ranch hand as he rode fence. The men jerked the cowboy off his horse, held their automatic weapons to his head and warned him not to move for one hour.

I asked Sheriff McIvon if his in-laws were going to be scared off their ranch. “No,” he said, “They didn’t scare them out. They are going to keep ranching. They have been there many, many years. They will be there till they decide to go to heaven.”

Like his neighbors, Sheriff McIvon also needs military surplus. He already has a helicopter pilot, but he would love a used helicopter, spare parts, and aviation fuel. It would be a great force multiplier if he could get remote surveillance equipment, sensors, and infra red scopes. He says that military surplus equipment would help him more than anything.

This week, Minority Leader John Boehner was gracious enough to allow me to plead the Sheriff’s case to him in person. How about you, President Obama? These law officers are the point of the spear. Will you give them the tools they need to do their jobs?

Lastly, I asked Sheriff McIvon, “If President Obama gives you all the help that you need, can you Texans win this war? He grinned, “I think we can take care of our side of it. We will do the best we could. I promise you that. We can take care of what we need to take care of….I guarantee ya. The Texans are going to stand tall and they will be pretty dag gum tough.”

Chris Burgard
Bordermovie.com
bordermovie.com

bighollywood.breitbart.com



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (71179)4/17/2009 4:57:44 AM
From: Sully-1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
Bring It On!

Mark Krikorian
Th Corner

I almost didn't link to this story, because I don't want to jinx it, but it was in USA Today, so I guess the cat's out of the bag:

<<< Hispanic groups call for Census boycott

Some Hispanic advocacy groups are calling for illegal immigrants to boycott the 2010 Census unless immigration laws are changed.
The move puts them at odds with leading immigrant rights advocates and creates another hurdle in the Census Bureau's quest to count everyone in the USA.

The National Coalition of Latino Clergy & Christian Leaders, a group that says it represents 20,000 evangelical churches in 34 states, issued a statement this week urging undocumented immigrants not to fill out Census forms unless Congress passes "genuine immigration reform."

Similar grass-roots campaigns are unfolding in Arizona and New Mexico to protest state and local crackdowns on illegal immigrants. Asking immigrants to be counted without giving them a chance to become legal residents counters church teachings, says the Rev. Miguel Rivera, president of the Latino religious coalition. >>>


I don't know that the Fathers of the Church taught anything about the subject, but in any case, this is fine with me.
It's like Cleavon Little holding a gun to his own head in Blazing Saddles, except the joke's on them. The exclusion of illegal aliens is something FAIR unsuccessfully sued to prevent in 1980 and 1990 (the courts said they lacked standing, if I remember correctly), because their inclusion distorts the apportionment of seats in the House of Representatives and the state legislatures. The inclusion of illegals in the count is a large part of the reason Democrats control the California legislature, for instance, because their districts have few voters but lots of illegals. Which is the reason for this quote:

<<< The call for a boycott "may be well-intended but misguided and ultimately irresponsible," says Arturo Vargas, executive director of the National Association of Latino Elected Officials and a member of a Census advisory panel. >>>

And then there's this, which would have fired up Jim Boulet, may he rest in peace:

<<< Nationally, efforts to have the Census reach Hispanics get backing from major Spanish-speaking media and organizations. For the first time, the Census will send forms in English and Spanish to about 13 million households in areas that have a high concentration of Hispanics. >>>

corner.nationalreview.com



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (71179)4/17/2009 7:03:19 AM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
It'd be major news if it were someone with a relationship to the Palin family. Presidents half-brother accused of sexual assault on 13 yo - no American press interest at all.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (71179)4/20/2009 11:45:13 AM
From: Sully-1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
He Is Who We Thought He Was

The Campaign Spot
Jim Geraghty Reporting

Jackson Diehl's column in today's Washington Post is thoroughly enjoyable for those of us who did not think that Obama's election would trigger the dawn of an era of foreign-policy nirvana.


<<< Now comes the interesting part: when it starts to become evident that Bush did not create rogue states, terrorist movements, Middle Eastern blood feuds or Russian belligerence — and that shake-ups in U.S. diplomacy, however enlightened, might not have much impact on them . . .

Obama sent a conciliatory public message to Iranians, and the United States joined in a multilateral proposal for new negotiations on its nuclear program. The regime responded by announcing another expansion of its uranium enrichment facility and placing an American journalist on trial for espionage. Obama told Iraqis that he would, as long promised, use troop withdrawals to pressure the government to take over responsibility for the country. Since he made that announcement, violence in Iraq has steadily increased.

Obama is not the first president to discover that facile changes in U.S. policy don't crack long-standing problems. Some of his new strategies may produce results with time. Yet the real test of an administration is what it does once it realizes that the quick fixes aren't working — that, say, North Korea and Iran have no intention of giving up their nuclear programs, with or without dialogue, while Russia remains determined to restore its dominion over Georgia. In other words, what happens when it's no longer George W. Bush's fault? That's what the next 100 days will tell us. >>>

Having said that, where would the American people get the idea that all it would take was a new president with his hand outstretched in friendship? Could it have been, say, the editors of the Post when they endorsed Obama?


<<< But Mr. Obama, as anyone who reads his books can tell, also has a sophisticated understanding of the world and America's place in it. He, too, is committed to maintaining U.S. leadership and sticking up for democratic values, as his recent defense of tiny Georgia makes clear. We hope he would navigate between the amoral realism of some in his party and the counterproductive cocksureness of the current administration, especially in its first term. On most policies, such as the need to go after al-Qaeda, check Iran's nuclear ambitions and fight HIV/AIDS abroad, he differs little from Mr. Bush or Mr. McCain. But he promises defter diplomacy and greater commitment to allies. His team overstates the likelihood that either of those can produce dramatically better results, but both are certainly worth trying. >>>


Besides my usual "all statements from Barack Obama come with an expiration date" mantra, I'm finding myself quoting former Arizona Cardinals coach Dennis Green, after his legendary post-game meltdown when his team came close to beating a much-touted Chicago Bears team, but fell short: "They were who we thought they were!"

As we see Obama accepting Chavez's anti-American book with a smile, as we see him traveling around the world and apologizing incessantly, as we see him starting a trade war with Mexico, as we see his Department of Homeland Security demonizing conservatives, as we see him bowing to the Saudi king, as we see him taking a meat cleaver to the defense budget, as we see him doubling already-enormous deficits . . . we find, he is who we thought he was.

campaignspot.nationalreview.com