Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (472822)	4/17/2009 2:35:49 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574226

Z, > Having a relationship just so you can have sex is worse than having casual sex, IMO. And cooking for yourself just so you can eat is no better than fast food. It's all about the healthy benefits. Tenchusatsu

To: SilentZ who wrote (472822)	4/17/2009 3:50:32 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 1574226

"Having a relationship just so you can have sex is worse than having casual sex, IMO." Getting MARRIED so you can have sex is the deepest abyss of pitifulness.

To: SilentZ who wrote (472822)	4/17/2009 4:30:47 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 1574226

"Having a relationship just so you can have sex is worse than having casual sex, IMO" Normal people don't get married or engage in a relationship just to have sex, dude. I can tell you are smart enough to know that so, why would you try to rationalize things that way? However, 'no personal relationship' is practically the definition of casual sex. wikihow.com "Casual sex refers to certain types of sexual activity outside the context of a romantic relationship. The term is not always used consistently: some use it to refer to any extramarital sex, some use it to refer to sex in a casual relationship, whereas others reserve its use for one-time encounters, promiscuity, or to refer to sex in the absence of emotional attachment or love." en.wikipedia.org