Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (96583)	4/17/2009 2:06:58 PM
From: Little Joe	5 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 116555

Contrary to your belief deficits did not start with Bush. In fact contrary to your belief history did not start with Bush. We had our share of bad dems Getting rid of Bush changed nothing not even the crooks who are ripping us off. lj

To: koan who wrote (96583)	4/17/2009 4:21:00 PM
From: Steve Lokness	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

Koan; He did none of those. Instead he concentrated on putting money into his rich friends pockets. You won't find me defending the Bush administration. I hated the war from the start and can't think of a positive thing he did for the country. Rather a dismal legacy huh? So stop that comparison with me. I likely am also one of the few here that support the Obama effort - but not Krugmans! But to compare deficit spending with the spending of WWII is nuts. Just tell me how Krugman expects this money to be paid back - without significantly higher taxes? Krugman is living in a lala land and that is NOT helpful to our plight. steve