SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (472959)4/17/2009 6:27:12 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Respond to of 1576660
 
I haven't heard specifically of that law, but I have read of restrictions on firing employees in western European countries.

Here's a story on firing restrictions in Italy:

nytimes.com

Italy has about the toughest restrictions in Europe on firing workers, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Article 18 of the Labor Code, passed in 1970, mandates that after a short probationary period, an employee fired from a company with 15 or more employees can bring a lawsuit challenging the dismissal. If the suit is successful, as is often the case, the employer is forced to rehire the worker and pay back wages and social insurance contributions, as well as a large fine.
.....
The problem is that the law is administered unevenly across regions, and serious offenses are often not considered just grounds for dismissal. A bank employee involved in money laundering, for example, was recently held unjustly dismissed and ordered reinstated by a judge.

Firing protections also affect worker performance. Examining data on 858 newly hired bank employees, Andrea Ichino, an economist at the European University in Florence, found that the absenteeism rate more than doubled after workers had completed the three-month probationary period. With little fear of dismissal, some employees provide less than peak effort when they do show up for work.


Duh!

Even worse, the uncertainty and expenses associated with dismissals have a chilling effect on hiring.

Duh!

A study led by Stefano Scarpetta of the O.E.C.D. released last week found that the average American company that survives two years increases its employment 160 percent, while the average Italian one that survives as long grows only 20 percent. Although many factors are undoubtedly at work, stiff firing restrictions probably account for some of Italy's lower job growth.


Duh!

''The cost of the job security of the father,'' Professor Ichino argues, ''is the insecurity of the son.'' Italy's jobless rate hovered around 10 percent in the last decade. Because its safety net has as many holes as Swiss cheese, high unemployment contributes to the remarkable fact that more than half of people in their 20's -- and nearly a quarter of men age 30 to 39 -- live with their parents. ''The family is the main institution that provides unemployment insurance benefits,'' Professor Ichino said.
....



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (472959)4/18/2009 3:26:20 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576660
 
I don't know if President Sarkozy was successful in repealing that law, but I knew he wanted to. I also knew that he ran into opposition from young activists who thought the law was good for them.

That's what ACORN reminds me of. Just a bunch of socialist idiots who create the very economic problems that they rail against.


Wow. Quite a leap there......from Acorn to the French. Do you imagine the politicians have "their fingers" in that one as well?