Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Little Joe who wrote (102729)	4/17/2009 9:59:31 PM
From: loantech	Respond to of 110194

Edit

To: Little Joe who wrote (102729)	4/17/2009 10:06:34 PM
From: loantech	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 110194

Joe I do not see how you ever look at anything objectively your bias is so strong. I voted for Raygun and realized later he 4 X'd the deficit in his tenure. Your outlook is similar to this: Bush II also ran up a huge deficit have you acknowledged that yet or do you ignore that too? I do not like the spending and bailouting Obama is doing either. But I can admit that. Did I make a mistake with my vote for Obama? The jury is still out but my vote for Raygun and Bush II was for sure a mistake. By insulting Elroy about types of charts is to me ridiculous unless you can prove with simple arithmetic that Raygun and Bush II were not guilty of huge deficit spending using any type of measuring stick. BTW Geithner (Geitner) and Summers are scum ripoffs on that I think we agree. In fact Obama should have put Paul O'Neal a Republican and Paul Volker and the Republican comptroller David Walker in charge they are person of moral courage and belief.

To: Little Joe who wrote (102729)	4/18/2009 1:59:34 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 110194

Do you understand why a chart of "debt to income ratio" is different from a chart of "total debt", which you mistakenly thought you were looking at? Obviously not. If you did, you'd be able to answer your own question and understand why a logarithmic chart is not used here. It's very important that you become educated enough to be able to think for yourself. You're not demonstrating that currently. No doubt you can envision this chart rising to 600% and higher. Boy are you in for a shock. Only once you have enough education will you be able to understand how Reagan and his gibbering followers set America onto the wrong path.