SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (301632)4/18/2009 7:38:08 AM
From: unclewest1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793846
 
The Daily Times Herald, Carroll, Iowa, article, "Guardsmen to conduct urban training at Arcadia in April", dated 2/17/2009, is at their website
carrollspaper.com

Due to Alex Jones' Talkshow Radio program attention, the exercise was supposed to be scaled back, per another article, "National Guard unit scales back plans, won't train at Arcadia", dated 2/23/2009, at
carrollspaper.com

It would appear from the lack of further reports in the Herald, circa the April 2 - 5 weekend, that the Guard did indeed cancel the training exercise for that weekend. Interestingly, this Guard unit sent folks to DC for the January inauguration to provide security. I suspect the urban training exercise was not the sole idea of the local commander, but had it's genesis in DC. Sort of a trial balloon... small, mid-western, rural community (Arcadia pop. ~500), and does indeed meet the criteria for a "population conditioning" exercise. Given the recently released Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) report on "Rightwing Extremism" threats, it would appear the folks in DC are the ones who are paranoid.
______________________________________________________

Subj: Population Conditioning

More conditioning of the population to accept uniformed troops occupying towns and searching homes. And why an arms dealer? More conditioning, guns and gun dealers bad.
fourwinds10.com



To: LindyBill who wrote (301632)4/18/2009 7:45:06 AM
From: unclewest3 Recommendations  Respond to of 793846
 
Here comes Ralph!!!
Don't miss the ending.
uw

THE VET 'THREAT'
GOV'T IDS PUBLIC ENEMY NO. 1

Napolitano: Homeland Security chief is indulging in pure bigotry.

HOLLYWOOD and countless professors warned us: Military vets are drooling trailer-trash who beat their wives and, at best, wind up as homeless street people -- at worst, as homicidal psychos deformed by war.

Now, thanks to our ever-vigilant Department of Homeland Security, the full extent of the danger has been revealed: Our so-called "war heroes" are rushing back to join right-wing-extremist hate groups to overthrow our government.

Full Report

There is a Complementary left-wing Assessment

Let's not quibble about little things like evidence. The Obama administration just knows that vets are all racist, Jew-hating crazies waiting to explode. Thank God, DHS has a fearless leader, Janet-from-another-planet Napolitano, who isn't afraid to call white trash "white trash."

In this administration's published opinion, those who've served in our military are a menace to society and the state. And DHS's racist, bigoted implication is that the only danger comes from white, Christian vets (there's not a whisper about minority violence).

Thanks for bringing us together, Mr. President.

Racism is racism. The left-wing propaganda document published officially by your government under the title "Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment" may be the shabbiest US Government publication of our time.

The report warns that "the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists . . . carrying out violent acts."

The document's evidence? None. It contains no hard data, no statistics. It's nothing but a racist, anti-military opinion column that might pass muster in The New York Times, but shouldn't be issued by our government.

The report adds that "rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans" who "possess combat skills." The point? Our hayseed, uneducated, unskilled, wacko vets aren't able to think for themselves and will be patsies for right-wing fanatics. Guess that's how things look from Harvard.

Then the report warns us that "a prominent civil-rights organization reported in 2006 that 'large numbers of potentially violent neo-Nazis, skinheads, and other white supremacists are now learning the art of warfare in the armed forces.' "

Which civil-rights organization? The Rev. Jeremiah Wright's? Why not name it? Why accept this bigoted hearsay? Where's the proof? Where's the data?

And where are those "large numbers of potentially violent neo-Nazis," anyway? Last time I checked, American Nazis had trouble mustering a couple dozen overweight losers in Halloween costumes.

Of course, Timothy McVeigh is invoked. Repeatedly. He's the sole example of a violent anti-government vet the report's drafters could produce. And there's no mention of the fact that, when he tried to join Special Forces, McVeigh promptly washed out and soon found his butt on the street. No, McVeigh will serve as eternal evidence that a homicidal nut lurks within every former soldier.

In just 8½ pages of text, the report manages to link our veterans to anti-Semitism, racism, economic failure and those dangerous citizens who think illegal immigration's a bad idea. Oh, and vets can't be trusted with firearms.

Your tax dollars at work.

But never fear: Obama's commissars at the Department of Homeland Security have already responded that DHS simultaneously issued a report on extremist danger from the left. It's title? "Leftwing Extremists Likely to Increase Use of Cyber Attacks over the Coming Decade."

Get the point? Left-wing extremists aren't violent (and right-wingers are too stupid to understand computers). Timothy McVeigh can be invoked, but let's not mention Bill Ayers, our president's good buddy (until he became inconvenient) or his murderous wife. Left-wing fanatics might make a little online mischief, but, hey -- kids will be kids.

Read both reports. You'll find that those on the political right (not just vets) are unable to cope with the stress of economic hardship, the real-estate crisis or job loss. Not a word about those issues driving leftists to extremes. They're just defending animal rights and the environment (honest -- read the reports).

Narco gangs aren't a threat, either. And the real and present danger from Islamist fanatics resident in our country goes unmentioned -- even though there's plenty of data on that threat. The only anti-government violence DHS fears comes from crackers with carbines.

And from chumps so dumb they joined the military.

We're the threat to our fellow citizens. You and me.

Our first minority president just took a giant step toward creating the most bigoted administration since that of arch-segregationist Woodrow Wilson.

Apologize to our veterans, Mr. President. And send Ms. Napolitano back to the minors.

Ralph Peters is so stupid he served in our military for almost 22 years.



To: LindyBill who wrote (301632)4/18/2009 7:55:28 AM
From: unclewest4 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793846
 
This is one of the most troubling assessments I've seen. Some of the points the author makes have worsened.
The weirdest thing is Tim Wood, PhD, the History Professor denied writing it.
uw

SOMETHING OF HISTORIC PROPORTIONS IS HAPPENING
By Tim Wood

I am a student of history. Professionally. I have written 15 books in six languages, and have studied it all my life.
I think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not believe it is just a banking crisis, or a mortgage crisis,
or a credit crisis. Yes these exist, but they are merely single facets on a very large gemstone that is only now coming into sharper focus...

Something of historic proportions is happening. I can sense it because I know how it feels, smells, what it looks like, and
how people react to it. Yes, a perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our country that has
been evolving for about ten - fifteen years. The pace has dramatically quickened in the past two.

We demand and then codify into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to people we know they can never pay back. Why?

We learn that the Federal Reserve, which has little or no real oversight by anyone, has 'loaned' two trillion dollars
(that is $2,000,000,000,000) over the past few months, but will not tell us to whom, or why, or disclose the terms.
That is our money. Yours and mine. And that is three times the $700B we all argued about so strenuously just this past September.

Who has this money? Why do they have it? Why are the terms unavailable to us? Who asked for it? Who authorized it?
I thought this was a government of 'we the people', who loaned our powers to our elected leaders. Apparently not.

We have spent two or more decades intentionally de-industrializing our economy. Why? We have intentionally dumbed
down our schools, ignored our history, and we no longer teach our founding documents, showing why we are exceptional
and why we are worth preserving. Students by and large cannot write, think critically, read, or articulate. Parents are not revolting,
teachers are not picketing, and school boards continue to back mediocrity.

Why? We have now established the precedent of protesting every close election (now violently in California over a proposition
that is so 'controversial' that it wants marriage to remain between one man and one woman!). Did you ever think such a thing
possible just a decade ago? We have corrupted our sacred political process by allowing unelected judges to write laws that radically
change our way of life, and then allow mainstream Marxist groups like ACORN and others to turn our voting system into a banana
republic. To what purpose?

Now our mortgage industry is collapsing, housing prices are in free fall, major industries are failing, our banking system is on the
verge of collapse, Social Security is nearly bankrupt, as is Medicare and our entire government, and our education system is worse
than a joke. (I teach college and know precisely what I am talking about.) The list is staggering in its length, breadth, and depth.
It is potentially 1929 x ten. And we are at war with an enemy we cannot name for fear of offending people of the same religion,
an enemy who cannot wait to slit the throats of your children if they have the opportunity to do so.

Now we have elected President a man no one knows anything about, who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen, let alone
a town as big as Wasilla, Alaska ..

All of his associations and alliances are with real radicals in their chosen fields of employment, and everything we learn about him,
drip by drip, is unsettling, if not downright scary. Surely you have heard him speak about his idea to create and fund a 'mandatory
civilian defense force' stronger than our military for use inside our borders. No? Oh, of course. The media would never play that for
you over and over, and then demand he explain it.

Sarah Palin's pregnant daughter and $150,000 wardrobe is more important to the media.

Mr. Obama's winning platform can be boiled down to one word: change. Why?

I have never been so afraid for my country and for my children as I am now! This man campaigned on bringing people together,
something he has never, ever done in his professional life. In my assessment, Obama will divide us along philosophical lines, push
us apart, and then try to realign the pieces into a new and different power structure. Change is indeed coming. And when it comes,
you will never see the same nation again.

And that is only the beginning. I thought I would never be able to experience what the ordinary, moral German felt in the mid-1930s.
In those times, the savior was a former smooth-talking rabble-rouser from the streets, about whom the average German knew next to
nothing. What they did know was that he was associated with groups that shouted, shoved, and pushed around people with whom
they disagreed. He edged his way onto the political stage through great oratory and promises.

Economic times were tough, people were losing jobs, and he was a great speaker. And he smiled and waved a lot. And people, even
newspapers, were afraid to speak out for fear that his 'brown shirts' would bully them into submission. And then, he was duly elected
to office as full-throttled economic crisis was at hand [the Great Depression]. Slowly but surely he seized the controls of government
power, department-by-department, person-by-person, bureaucracy-by-bureaucracy.

The kids joined a Youth Movement in his name, where they were taught what to think. How did he get the people on his side? He did
it promising jobs to the jobless, money to the moneyless, and goodies for the military-industrial complex. He did it by indoctrinating the
children, advocating gun control, health care for all, better wages, better jobs, and promising to re-instill pride once again in their country,
across Europe, and around the world.

He did it with a compliant media. Did you know that? And he did this all in the name of justice and... change. And the people surely
got what they voted for. (Look it up if you think I am exaggerating.)

Read your history books. Many people objected in 1933 and were shouted down, called names, laughed at, and made fun of. When
Winston Churchill pointed out the obvious in the late 1930s while seated in the House of Lords in England (he was not yet Prime Minister),
he was booed into his seat and called a crazy troublemaker. He was right, though.

Don't forget that Germany was the most educated, cultured country in Europe. It was full of music, art, museums, hospitals, laboratories,
and universities. And in less than six years --- a shorter time span than just two terms of the U. S. presidency --- it was rounding up its
own citizens, killing others, abrogating its laws, turning children against parents, and neighbors against neighbors. All with the best of
intentions, of course. The road to hell is paved with them.

As a practical thinker, one not overly prone to emotional decisions, I have a choice: I can either believe what the objective pieces of evidence
tell me (even if they make me cringe with disgust); I can believe what history is shouting to me from across the chasm of seven decades;
or I can hope I am wrong by closing my eyes, having another latte, and ignoring what is transpiring around me.

Some people scoff at me, others laugh, or think I am foolish, naive, or both. Perhaps I am. But I have never been afraid to look people
in the eye and tell them exactly what I believe, and why I believe it.

I pray I am wrong. I do not think I am wrong.

Tim Wood is a professor of History and Political Science at Southwest Baptist University, Bolivier, Missouri