Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito who wrote (301810)	4/20/2009 1:09:31 PM
From: mph	7 Recommendations Respond to of 793755

I believe you are wrong about the Obama Administration knowing the difference between terrorism and man made disasters. usnews.com <snip> Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano wants to refer to terrorism as "man caused disasters" in what she admits is a deliberate effort to change the tone. And the White House now says "Global War on Terror" is out; "Overseas Contingency Operations" are in--as was discussed at length when they first made the change..... Evidently, they only want to call Americans "terrorists." The truth is that Obama lied when he claimed to desire inclusiveness and to be a healing President. He has done just exactly the opposite, including the most radical of appointments. I was not in the least surprised by this because his background showed where he'd go, despite his efforts to hide it and plead ignorance. I would bet substantial money that a huge percentage of people who voted for Obama were clueless to his radicalism, simply listened to his rhetoric and wanted to vote for the candidate with the D after his name. Since the media gave him a pass, the public at large didn't know what they were electing. I would further bet that the only people on the left unhappy with Obama are the militant anti-war types who thought the troops should be brought home from everywhere by January 25th at the latest.