SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: vinod Khurana who wrote (3818)10/27/1997 11:14:00 AM
From: vinod Khurana  Respond to of 74651
 
Readers find MS anticompetitive
By Suzan Revah
October 21, 1997, 1:55 p.m. PT

Even if it has a lot to offer the PC marketplace,
Microsoft (MSFT) is on the verge of eliminating
competition and undermining consumer choice,
readers indicated in the latest NEWS.COM poll.

The bundling of Microsoft's Internet Explorer into
the software giant's Windows operating system is
a move many readers hailed as one that adds a
new degree of functionality
and convenience to
computing, and likely will
revolutionize the future of OS
development.

Nevertheless, 61 percent of poll respondents
questioned the move's impact on the free market
and voted in support of the Justice Department's
charges. They agreed with the DOJ that
Microsoft's efforts to dominate the browser
market by offering Explorer free to all Windows
users could result in an unfair monopoly.

"It has been a while since antitrust laws were used
for the benefit of consumers and consumer
choice. This may be
one of the best
examples of these
laws being used for
the good of
technological
advancement and
consumer interests,"
wrote Mark D.
Slosberg, president of
Net Information
Systems. "The issue is
predatory pricing and
eliminating choice, and
the Justice Department is taking a strong and
important stand. Make Microsoft's products
compete in the marketplace!"

Indeed, some respondents tossed around
references to "Big Brother" when opining on
Microsoft's attempt to extract itself from antitrust
suspicion by claiming that Explorer is merely part
of its OS and that Windows users are under no
obligation to use it. Of the 39 percent who voted
against the DOJ's action, many objected to Bill
Gates's heavy-handed effort to make Explorer the
default browser for PCs. Some argued that
Explorer is but an inferior copy of Netscape's
Navigator, the browser Microsoft seeks to
supplant.

However, some poll respondents felt that the
DOJ chose the wrong battle for taking on
Microsoft, arguing that incorporating a browser
into an OS is an innovation that has been a long
time coming. Many objected to what they see as
government intrusion into efforts to set a new
standard for the PC market.

"Of all the things to beat up on Microsoft about, I
can think of few that are more harmful to the end
user than this one if it is codified into law," wrote
Craig Cline, editorial director of Seybold
Publications. "To tell any OS vendor that it can't
build additional functionality into an OS--where
Web browsing really belongs--runs the risk
of...impeding the natural evolution of the browser
into the desktop and vice-versa, which most folks
view as a good thing."


Copyright c 1995-97 CNET, Inc. All rights reserved.



To: vinod Khurana who wrote (3818)10/27/1997 11:15:00 AM
From: vinod Khurana  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
The following is a letter from Don Hardwick, Microsoft's head of OEM
sales, to Celeste Dunn, Compaq's vice president of consumer software
business. Hardwick says Microsoft will terminate Compaq's license for
Windows 95 unless the PC maker restored the Microsoft Network and
Internet Explorer icons on the desktop.

June 6, 1996

Ms. Celeste Dunn
Vice President
Consumer Software Business Unit, Compaq
1111 Bayhill Drive, Suite 475
San Bruno, CA 94066

Re: Notice of Intent to Terminate License Agreement #1107-3053, dated
October 1, 1992

Dear Celeste:

I appreciated speaking with you over the phone earlier today. As we
discussed, in the spirit of reinstating mutual cooperation and trust we would
like to resolve the above mentioned Notice of Intent to Terminate letter in as a
quick and mutually agreeable manner as possible.

To accomplish this, Microsoft is requesting that Compaq replace the
Microsoft Network and Internet Explorer icons on the Windows 95 desktop
on all Compaq Presario machines. Specifically we are asking that these icons
be put back on the Windows 95 desktop so they look and function exactly
the same as how they were originally provided by Microsoft and/or
Authorized Replicators. This means the icons should not be just Windows 95
shortcuts, since the functionality is different. In addition, the Microsoft
Network and Internet Explorer icons and Internet Setup Wizard icon should
also be put back into their original locations and functionality under the "Start"
button on Windows 95.

If you are willing to give Microsoft a clear written assurance that the above
will be implemented on all Compaq Presario machines within sixty (60) days
of the date of this letter, Microsoft will withdraw its Notice of Intent to
Terminate letter addressed to David Cabello and dated May 30, 1996 once
such written assurance is received by Microsoft. By withdrawing the Notice
of Intent to Terminate letter Microsoft does not waive or limit its rights under
the Agreement.

I [sic] you would like to discuss this further, or would like more detail, please
let me know and I will respond immediately. Once again, we appreciate your
openness and willingness to discuss and resolve the above issues.

Sincerely,

Don Hardwick Group Manager, OEM Sales Division

cc: David Cabello, Compaq Legal Department

Steve Flannigan, Vice President, Compaq Computer Corporation

Joachim Kempin, Sr. Vice President, Microsoft OEM Sales Division

Bengt Akerlind, Director, Microsoft OEM Sales Division

Back to Top
Copyright c 1995-97 CNET, Inc. All rights reserved.