Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RJA_ who wrote (48811)	4/20/2009 4:59:22 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219928

You are the one not taking care with your words by posting what stinks of muckraking GARBAGE and then NOT producing it, and naming the source specifically. One can NOT post something as outrageous as that and that happens to be totally contrary to Faber previous views and NOT have demanded you back it up. Your "it's subcription" is Rubish. i have often posted copyrighted material to support something seemingly outrageous. i do NOT call you a liar, but i am calling to account that your source rings of being the work of a muckraking hack using Faber's name. Something that would be like the Strafor Report. i am quite capable to do a mental scan of every Faber news letter he has written over the past for years,(i have just done this--it takes about a5 seconds) and in that time he NEVER wrote anything like that, not EVEN remotely. i will say if you don't produce the source i have the right to charge that YOUR SOURCEn is scandalous RUBBISH.Max