Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (2549)	4/22/2009 12:22:00 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

<You are simply equivocating on the word "evolution".> Poppycock. If you have an accusation to make, then back it up. What is YOUR version of evolution? <"we see change everywhere it is literally PERVASIVE in everything we sense and experience"Really: do we see non life suddenly evolving into life? Spontaneous generation?> Is that a rebuttle of what I said, or just being an asshole? Why would "change" in one element in the decay to another consist of spontaneous generation?? If you are going to refute the claim, use an example that fits... speaking of "logic". < Again; If Darwinian evolution is true; then why is it not reflected in the fossil record? > Why pick on Darwin? If ANY evolution is true, we'd see it in the fossil record no? Darwin didn't invent the term, let's start broadly and discuss instead of just being an ass hole. <What we do see, are relatively trivial changes within already established species.> But don't we also see different organisms associated with different times in history?? And what do you mean by "trivial"... and is evolution then "non-trivial".. as defined by??? Examples would be nice. For instance, is a bacterial cell picking up a plastid changing it into a bacterial cell that is now immune resistant to a given anti-bacterial agent "trivial"... or??? DAK