Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (96809)	4/22/2009 1:49:01 AM
From: Hawkmoon	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

My son in law says they are pretty damn sure about global warming. I guarantee you the examples you bring up have been gone over many times, with satelites! Well.. there are thousands of other scientists who are not, and their evidence is just as convincing and far less politically biased. Personally speaking, I think it's rather incredulous to make such a conclusion with only 100 years of data and based solely upon analysis of CO2 levels. Check back with me in 10-20 years, after Solar Cycle 25, and maybe we'll have sufficient data to draw a preliminary conclusion. Personally speaking, I fear we're on the verge of another mini-ice age like the Maunder Minimum. In such a case, I'll be looking for whatever global warming influence we can generate. Come over the Politics of Energy thread if you wish to discuss it further. Hawk

To: koan who wrote (96809)	4/22/2009 3:24:41 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	13 Recommendations Respond to of 116555

>>My son in law says they are pretty damn sure about global warming.<< why has the earth cooled in the presence of immense CO2 emissions over the last DECADE? how did the ice age end without humans to warm the planet? why is it snowing in seattle in april? kusi.com does your son in law know more about weather than john coleman? the TRUTH is we don't know what is going on with any level of scientific certainty, BUT THAT CONCLUSION DOESN'T PAY WELL AND NOBODY CAN INCREASE TAXES BASED ON THAT THEME.