SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (96886)4/22/2009 7:39:58 PM
From: benwood  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Ok... you were a bit vague in that bit.

Boondoggles abound, I agree, and many of them will backfire anyway. It's Man's way.

I'm for something that coincidentally reduces carbon emissions, not necessarily for the reduction of carbon, but because an energy shock will radically alter our way of life, and I don't like the sound of that. If we don't use the cheap energy now to create the plentiful energy of the future, we're kind of screwed, I think.

And what we do use, we must use more efficiently. That in turn frees up capacity (hopefully...) to produce e.g. solar panels and wind mills.



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (96886)4/22/2009 10:35:52 PM
From: Webster Groves1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116555
 
<we are losing heat from the sun>

I wasn't aware of this.

Seems more like all the hot air from the GW deniers will ensure its reality.

Here is a test:

How many conservative Republicans believe in global warming ? Any ? Denial is a political position and nothing more.

wg


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News