SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Dodgy Ticker who wrote (302564)4/24/2009 12:44:59 PM
From: Nadine Carroll12 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794376
 

I think what's missing in this debate is that torture is being portrayed as discrete; i.e., all or none. We would be better served, IMO, to view torture as a continuum, and that what we (USA) did was at the extreme lower end of that continuum (and was justified, again IMO).


What's also missing is that torture is not defined according to personal feelings, but by law. Waterboarding is not torture. This is a legal statement of fact. If Congress wants to define it as torture they must pass a law. What Obama is attempting to do is criminalize the legal opinions of the previous administration, an unprecedented action.



To: The Dodgy Ticker who wrote (302564)4/24/2009 12:53:08 PM
From: Geoff Altman1 Recommendation  Respond to of 794376
 
torture is being portrayed as discrete; i.e., all or none. We would be better served, IMO, to view torture as a continuum,

What we need is to redefine the word torture. If we go by Merriam-Webster:

1 a: anguish of body or mind : agony b: something that causes agony or pain
2: the infliction of intense pain (as from burning, crushing, or wounding) to punish, coerce, or afford sadistic pleasure

If we go by this definition then you could classify routine police questioning as torture. After all that causes mental duress and agony in some cases, especially when you have lengthy interrogations with sleep deprivation.... IMO there's a need to separate the permanent physical and mental damage which are the results of true torture and the temporary discomfort and fear that are the results of water boarding. Bush tried to do this by using the term enhanced interrogation, but that was rejected by critics....



To: The Dodgy Ticker who wrote (302564)4/24/2009 1:54:27 PM
From: Neeka  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794376
 
It is so disingenuous to equate waterboarding to beheading or incinerating.