SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (63705)4/25/2009 1:10:16 PM
From: longnshort3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224728
 
He's meeting my expectations also and all the conservatives I know.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (63705)4/25/2009 1:23:45 PM
From: TideGlider3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224728
 
Kenneth Says:



Obama replaces God

Obama performs miracles

Obama washes Kenneth's feet

Obama uses stem cells to cure all blind people

Obama President for Life!



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (63705)4/25/2009 1:28:00 PM
From: TideGlider3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224728
 
Friday, April 24, 2009
President "Thin-Skin" Threatens GOP... Will Nationalize Healthcare Without Them

President Thin-Skin met with House leaders today and reminded them over and over and over again that not 1 Republican in the House voted for his outrageous spending bills that will quadruple the national deficit this year.

Because of this, Obama promised to nationalize healthcare without their input.
The Huffington Post reported:

In a meeting with House Republicans at the White House Thursday, President Obama reminded the minority that the last time he reached out to them, they reacted with zero votes -- twice -- for his stimulus package. And then he reminded them again. And again. And again.

A GOP source familiar with the meeting said that the president was extremely sensitive -- even "thin-skinned" -- to the fact that the stimulus bill received no GOP votes in the House. He continually brought it up throughout the meeting.

Obama also offered payback for that goose egg. A major overhaul of the health care system, he told the Republican leadership, would be done using a legislative process known as reconciliation, meaning that the GOP won't be able to filibuster it.

Congress has until October 15 to pass health care or student lending reform under the normal process. If it doesn't, reconciliation can be used to eliminate the 60-vote requirement.
Evidently, the fact that Obama met with GOP leaders to tell them what he was going to do counts in his mind as reaching out to the opposition.
Posted by Gateway Pundit at 4/24/2009 06:51:00 PM
gatewaypundit.blogspot.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (63705)4/25/2009 4:20:09 PM
From: chartseer  Respond to of 224728
 
Oh Bummer!

delete duplicate?

chartseer



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (63705)4/25/2009 4:20:46 PM
From: chartseer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224728
 
Oh Bummer!

He is exceeding my expectations of a socialist agenda. He is making Saul Alinsky very very proud. My only question is how come I still have to pay my own dental bills? Isn't dental a part of healthcare?

chartseer



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (63705)4/28/2009 8:57:51 AM
From: jlallen5 Recommendations  Respond to of 224728
 
Here's another Gallup poll...

Gallup: 55% Say Terrorists Were Asking For It

By Michael Goldfarb

A majority of Americans (55%) say that the Bush administration's use of harsh interrogation techniques was "justified," which according to the nattering nabobs of the net-left means that more than half of all Americans are un-American torture apologists. I was struck by a line in Paul Krugman's column last week that seemed to capture the left's total disconnect on this issue. Krugman said that "never before have our leaders so utterly betrayed everything our nation stands for" as the Bush administration had with its treatment of captured terrorists. It's a ludicrous statement, and probably offensive to many Americans who have a history of enduring far worse at the hands of the federal government (blacks, Chinese, Japanese, Mormons, Indians, etc. etc.), but it almost certainly represents the tone of any potential government inquiry into the matter -- a course supported by 51 percent of Americans according to Gallup.

Democrats don't seem to understand they're playing with fire. The White House has already lost control of the debate over this issue -- nearly the only issue where President Obama is at odds with the public. If an inquiry is launched, the victims of Bush administration cruelty, the faces of Dick Cheney's crimes against humanity, will be Khalid Sheik Mohamed and Abu Zubaydah. For some reason Democrats think that Americans will rally to defend the basic human rights of these terrorists. It's the first time in a long time that Democrats seem to be the ones in a cocoon, while Republicans seem well in touch with the American people. Like Noemie Emery says: "let the hearings begin."