SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wayners who wrote (11893)4/26/2009 7:53:17 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 103300
 
The other difference is that the "water torture" the Japanese used is in no way similar to the waterboarding used by the Bush Admin.

J.



To: Wayners who wrote (11893)4/27/2009 8:03:57 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Re: "One big difference is the japs tortured American regular troops fighting under rules of war....."

And, (earlier still...), when the US Court-Martialed some of it's own troops in the Spanish American War for water-torturing Philipa rebels (who were, obviously, NOT part of any nation's formal army), all WELL BEFORE the Geneva Conventions, what about that?

That would seem to be at least one historical example that is counter to your paradigm that it is 'OK' to water-torture combatants just so long as they are not a formal part of a nation's armed forces, or from a nation that has not ratified the post WW II Geneva Conventions....