Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (475687)	4/27/2009 11:13:10 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1589411

>> So what do you make of John McCain then? McCain is not impartial on this subject. >> A broad wide ranging group think he did But surely you wouldn't suggest that the American People have the facts on this subject! The media has been totally one-sided as usual, and the People have no idea that Congress was briefed throughout the process, that Bush had appropriate legal support for his position, and frankly, many have very short memories. Whether or not you understand it (I find you to be rather dense, as are many nutjob liberals), what is appropriate is determined in part by the circumstances. It was with FDR, with Wilson, with Lincoln, and with other presidents. In times of war a president has to be more aggressive. And this isn't rough interrogation of American citizens. These were people whom were known to have killed or been complicit in the deaths of 3,000 Americans. Rough treatment of such individuals is totally appropriate, called for, and frankly, it was a heroic act on Bush's part. Contrast that with our current president who has apologized to every leader the world around (for what, we don't know) and who has kissed the asses of some bitter enemies. And he's not through yet.