Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Naked Shorting-Hedge Fund & Market Maker manipulation? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Ox who wrote (4384)	5/1/2009 1:11:47 PM
From: basserdan	1 Recommendation Respond to of 5034

"Why does the author ignore the fact that if there is a surge in "counterfeit shares", it will dilute the stock!!!! Quite naturally, the stock will fall in price when there is dilution. How is this taking "the same economic risks"?" Hi T O, He (Norris) is, imo, either a colossal ignoramus or just another member of the "captured media" who, knowing the jig is coming to an end, simply tried to spin it in a less harmful manner to the NSS players. Hence, my comment at the top of the post you responded to..... "Imo, begs the question of who is paying Norris to write this crap?"

To: The Ox who wrote (4384)	5/1/2009 8:38:02 PM
From: Hawkmoon	5 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5034

What do you expect?? It's Floyd Norris and he's in the vest pockets of Wall St shortsellers. Either that or he's just absolutely clueless. Hawk

To: The Ox who wrote (4384)	5/2/2009 6:52:54 AM
From: rrufff	1 Recommendation Respond to of 5034

If you'll notice the author goes between shorting and NSS without warning and simply ignores the argument that NSS is something different from shorting a defined and finite float of shares. Supply and demand are apparently meaningless to these cindyyahoo's of the world, who blindly defend shortie manipulation, as something of the lesser of evils. Notice the argument about efficient markets. How can someone argue that when the creation of shares out of thin air is being defended?