Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (64209)	5/3/2009 10:13:11 AM
From: tonto	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224757

Of course it is not required. So? Boxer was a stupid post to throw out there. You really have become a waste of bandwidth... It runs right along with your silly post thinking that voting and passing bills without reading them is "the year of..." THAT was one of your most disingenuous posts ever.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (64209)	5/3/2009 10:20:21 AM
From: Sedohr Nod	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224757

I see your point...highest court in the land so it's really silly to expect more than a basic grasp of the law. So let's strive to get an openly gay appointee, or maybe a repeat offending ex-con with plenty of experience from the other side, or better yet maybe someone that has competed in the special olympics....we need to be more inclusive and far less selective in picking that group of nine. Strick standards are for the heartless.